The early Olympians believed that it wasn't winning but trying that's important, while the famed American football Coach Vince Lombardi took the point of view that winning wasn't just everything, it was the only thing. I propose a moderate middle ground when it comes to the fun of "blind" wine tasting: It's not whether you win but how you try that's important.
As it turns out, this pragmatic approach is shared by the Court of Master Sommeliers, which, in its hellishly difficult certification tests, requires considerable blind tasting of sommeliers-in-training but pays most attention to the analytical process that leads them to their response. A random shot that misses the target earns no credit, but a well-crafted analysis may earn praise for its thought process even if it came out in the wrong place.
Why reward a wrong answer? I can't speak for the sommelier organization, but in my mind, the intelligent enjoyment of wine isn't about winning at all costs, it's learning to think about our favorite beverage in a way that helps us learn something about it. Trying to guess the exact variety, region or even producer and vintage of an unknown wine can really focus your attention, especially in competition with friends.
Friday's deliberations, at the cozy Markt restaurant, a Belgian-style bistro near Greenwich Village, featured an offbeat sparkler followed by four unnamed wines served with a choice of dishes to match: Two whites with a seafood dish, and two reds with a meat course. Participants were given a list of 12 possible grape varieties to check off for each color, making this really more of a "near-sighted" tasting than a "blind" one; but it didn't make things much easier - a few math wizards at our table speculated that this placed the odds at hitting all four in a random selection at 225,042 to 1.
In lieu of the usual tasting notes, I thought you'd enjoy a quick diary of my tasting, along with the thought process that led me to, well, 2 1/2 wrong answers out of four.
The first wine, served as an aperitif and not part of the competition, was a sparkler, not foamy but prickly, with intriguing aromas that mingled tart apple cider with an attractive plowed-field minerality, leading into a marked bitter-almond finish. I toyed with the possibility of Italian Franciacorta but decided that the lovely minerality spoke of the Loire. Good guess! It was Thierry Puzelat's Pétillant Naturel Vin Pétillant de France, a wine made in such defiance of the Appellation Controlée regulations that it's labeled merely "French wine" without any more descriptive geographical term. Past vintages have been Chenin Blanc, and I assume this one was, too.
With my first course, a rich and creamy lobster bisque, I pondered the two whites. The first was tartly acidic with good green-apple aromas and a sturdy body and structure, with lots of complexity, a perceptible chalky minerality and a slight bitter finish. It rang a distant bell, reminding me of a Loire white I had enjoyed in the past. Good pick, and it underscores a fundamental of blind tasting: If your subconscious tosses up a clear message, pay attention to it. Your first instinct is often right, if you have the wit to hear it. It was the Romorantin variety, François Cazin 2002 Cour-Cheverny Le Petit Chambord.
The second was an entirely different style of white, aromatic and peachy, also rather full-bodied with just a hint of sweetness. I would have guessed Viognier, but that wasn't on the pick list, so I ticked off Albariño, without great confidence. Nope. It was my first-ever encounter with the Nosiola variety, the Giuseppi Fanti 2003 Trentino Nosiola.
A pair of reds came with my main course of rare grilled entrecôte steak with Belgian-style frites, and they were about as different as two red wines can be. The glass on the right bore a pretty, reddish-purple fluid, so light and bright that it almost looked like a rosé. The other glass approached the opposite end of the red hue, so dark that it looked black in the dim eatery light; holding it close to a table candle revealed a day-glo violet edge. The light-color wine breathed aromas of perfumed red-berry fruit with lots of spice. Its spicy fruitcake character made me think of the Italian Ruché grape, but it's usually a dark wine; this item's pale color and slight herbaceous notes nudged me to guess Dornfelder, a modern German red grape. Wrong again! It's another variety I had never tasted, the unusual Petite Rouge, a wine from the Val d'Aosta in the Northwestern Italian Alps, Grosjean Frères 2003 Torrette Vallee d'Aoste.
The darker wine was strong, robust and earthy, with rather light plummy aromas, black plums and a pretty damp-earth minerality that, reviewing the list, I guessed as Refosco from Northeastern Italy's Friuli. Wrong again ... but not exactly. After dinner, when Century Club co-founder Steve DeLong pulled off the colorful nylon wrappers that had concealed the bottles, he realized to his horror that the wine wasn't the one originally ordered, and in fact wasn't even on the list. Being nothing if not flexible, Steve collared every potential winner and invited them to take another stab, with the hint that it was Italian and was "not that uncommon." OK, then. It had to be Barbera, and indeed it was: Tavijn 2003 Barbera d'Asti.
Two out of four correct answers proved to be enough to win this extremely difficult contest, so much to my somewhat embarrassed surprise, I followed the Lombardi rule and took home the trophy. My original point about process remains, though: Practice blind tasting, think about what you drink, and you'll learn a lot about wine.
For more information about the Wine Century Club, an informal assocation open to wine enthusiasts upon application and a list of at least 100 wine-grape varieties that you've tasted, click to
Whether you're looking for a grape as common as Pinot Noir or as obscure as Hondarrabi Zuri, you'll find them on the Varietal Table, each entry loaded with concise information about the grape, its identifying characteristics, the wines it's used in, and where it's from.
The boxed set is $35, and if you should decide to buy one, this link will return a small commission to help pay the rent at WineLoversPage.com:
TALK ABOUT WINE ONLINE:
If you prefer to comment privately, feel free to send me E-mail at email@example.com. I'll respond personally to the extent that time and volume permit.
PRINT OUT TODAY'S ARTICLE
$75 Gift of Wine from The California Wine Club!
If you've not yet ordered from The California Wine Club's Bloomin' Big Wine Sale, today is the day to do so. Why? Because if you order before Wednesday, March 22, they'll send you a bottle of Cabernet from a California cult-status winemaker. It's a $75 value, free ... here's what you have to do:
Order three cases (or more) of wine from the Signature Series or Little Known Gems selections and you'll receive the Tom Eddy Wines 2000 "Napa Valley" Cabernet Sauvignon, a $75 wine, as a gift. Click here to order:
The 2000 Tom Eddy Cab is characterized by sweet oak, ripe black cherry, floral notes and an opulent finish. It's quite fantastic and if you can, plan to order some in addition the one bottle you'll receive.
The California Wine Club's Bloomin’ Big Wine Sale ends March 31, 2006. This Tom Eddy offer ends Wednesday, March 22.
This week on WineLoversPage.com
Some highlights of recent articles on WineLoversPage.com that I hope you'll enjoy:
Wine Advisor Premium Edition: Tuscan traditions
Hot topics in our WineLovers' Community
This week's poll: Best cheap fizz
Last Week's Wine Advisor Index
The Wine Advisor's daily edition is usually distributed on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays (and, for those who subscribe, the FoodLetter on Thursdays). Here's the index to last week's columns:
No edition, travel day. (March 10, 2006)
Best cheap fizz (March 15, 2006)
Wine and the Irish (March 13, 2006)
Complete 30 Second Wine Advisor archive:
Wine Advisor FoodLetter: Greens and sausage soup (March 16, 2006)
Wine Advisor Foodletter archive:
To subscribe or unsubscribe from The 30 Second Wine Advisor, change your E-mail address, or for any other administrative matters, please use the individualized hotlink found at the end of your E-mail edition. If this is not practical, contact me by E-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org, including the exact E-mail address that you used when you subscribed, so I can find your record.
We do not use our E-mail list for any other purpose and will never give or sell your name or E-mail address to anyone. I welcome feedback, suggestions, and ideas for future columns. To contact me, please send E-mail to email@example.com
All the wine-tasting reports posted here are consumer-oriented. In order to maintain objectivity and avoid conflicts of interest, I purchase all the wines I rate at my own expense in retail stores and accept no samples, gifts or other gratuities from the wine industry.
Monday, March 20, 2006