This article was published in The 30 Second Wine Advisor on Wednesday, May 24, 2006.
New from Laurel Glen
One of my oldest wine-industry pals, and perhaps not coincidentally one of the California wine makers I most admire, is Patrick Campbell of Laurel Glen Vineyards in Sonoma, a philosopher-winemaker who I've known through our online forums since some time back in the 1980s.
I've always been impressed by Patrick's thoughtful approach to quality and his commitment to making wines that reflect the land in which they're grown ... and his consumer-friendly approach to keeping the prices of his wines rational for their value. His flagship wine, Laurel Glen Sonoma Mountain Cabernet Sauvignon, has long ranked among California's most celebrated Cabernets, but - while it's certainly priced for a special occasion - it has never joined the cultish race for triple or even quadruple digits that we see in some CalCabs that can't match its quality.
Better still, the bulk of Laurel Glen's portfolio, from the more affordable Counterpoint Cabernet to the lovable under-$10 REDS, not to mention his growing collection of fine Argentine red wines, consistently rank among my favorites for quality and value.
So naturally I was delighted when a bunch of recent Laurel Glen releases recently reached the market. I quickly tasted the first three - the 2004 REDS, a 2003 Malbec - first of that variety bottled under the Terra Rosa label - and a 2004 Val de Pena, a new label for a higher-end single-vineyard Argentine red.
Hmmm.
Make no mistake: These are good wines. But I sensed a consistent new direction in them, one that struck me as odd for Patrick Campbell. They were big wines, hot and alcoholic; fruit-forward and, at least in the case of the Argentines, surprisingly touched with the distinct presence of new oak.
I immediately sent Patrick a whining E-mail, asking, "What's up with this? It's almost as if you're trying for Parker or Spectator points!"
Unfailingly civil, he didn't "flame" me back, other than to reassure me that Laurel Glen is "certainly not consciously making wines to assuage the P/S palates" and, indeed, doesn't even send samples to the usual suspects. "Good wake-up call ... thanks," he said, with civility that I probably didn't deserve.
"Yeah ... They all three are higher in alc than I would like, and largely it's a function of the vintage, particularly in the REDS. 2004 was a very ripe year in Mendoza, so vintage is a factor as well," he went on, adding that with the Argentine wines, "We are finding that Malbec harvested under 14 percent seems rather green. This is a conclusion based only on eight years' experience, so the jury is still out, but the evidence is trending that way. I would prefer to have a lower alc, but with Malbec we might just have to settle with a higher alc in order to achieve balance and fruit purity. But you have spurred me into doing a couple of experiments for next year."
As for oak, he added, "I think we overdid it a bit with the Vale la Pena, but I think the other two are in good balance. Next time I drink them I'll really pay attention. As you know, we are usually quite cautious with our use of oak."
I can't ask for a more candid response than that. Now that I know we're not seeing a trend here, I'm comfortable ... and looking forward to trying the newly released 2002 Laurel Glen Estate and Counterpoint Cabernets before long. I'll keep you posted on that.
BUY THESE WINES ONLINE:
To check prices and find online vendors, enter the wine name into the databases at Wine-Searcher.com,
|