Ullage

The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Moderators: Jenise, David M. Bueker, Robin Garr

Ullage

Postby Howie Hart » Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:48 am

David's post about "High Towers" raises (for me) the question of ullage, so I thought I bring it up in a new thread. The last few bottles of 1975 Lafite I've opened were selected based on ullage. The wine still has the original corks and I selected bottles to open that had the most ullage, nothing extreme, all still into the neck and none more than about an inch below the cork. The 3 remaining bottles are all about 3/4 inch below the cork. I indicated in David's post that I felt the wine had peaked in 2000. However, the bottles opened since than were the ones with the most ullage, so I'm wondering if there is a correlation between ullage and aging; ie., would a bottle with greater head space show more age than one with less? BTW - I open a bottle every 5 years and for those doing the math, the reason I only have 3 left is because I opened one for friends at MOCOOL a few years ago and donated one to the Hurricane Katrina fundraiser that went to Dale.
Chico - Hey! This Bottle is empty!
Groucho - That's because it's dry Champagne.
User avatar
Howie Hart
The Hart of Buffalo
 
Posts: 5916
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 5:13 pm
Location: Niagara Falls, NY

Re: Ullage

Postby Thomas » Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:56 am

Howie Hart wrote: would a bottle with greater head space show more age than one with less?


The short answer is that it should.

For a more precise answer one would have to talk about a variety of specifics.
Thomas
Senior Flamethrower
 
Posts: 3574
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:23 pm

Re: Ullage

Postby David M. Bueker » Fri Oct 04, 2013 11:19 am

With old wines the higher fill bottles almost always (almost is an important qualifier) show better.
There behind the glass lies a real blade of grass. Be careful as you pass. Move along. Move along.
User avatar
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
 
Posts: 21980
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Ullage

Postby Mark Lipton » Fri Oct 04, 2013 11:59 am

Howie, ullage is a good proxy for the integrity of the cork, and the integrity of the cork is one of the main factors determining the shape the wine is in (but not the only, for sure).

Mark Lipton
User avatar
Mark Lipton
Oenochemist
 
Posts: 4315
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:18 pm
Location: Indiana

Re: Ullage

Postby Dale Williams » Fri Oct 04, 2013 1:56 pm

Personally, while I'll always choose the best fill if buying, my guess is that the difference between decades old bottles from same case with fills into necks is very minimal. Those are great fills, and any differences are as likely to be due to original fill as to actual ullage/loss.
User avatar
Dale Williams
Compassionate Connoisseur
 
Posts: 7851
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Yup....

Postby TomHill » Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:27 am

Dale Williams wrote:Personally, while I'll always choose the best fill if buying, my guess is that the difference between decades old bottles from same case with fills into necks is very minimal. Those are great fills, and any differences are as likely to be due to original fill as to actual ullage/loss.


I would go w/ Dale's thought here...minimal. More a function of btl variation than anything.
I've had btls in which 1/3'rd to 1/2 ullaged away (mostly LH Zins) thru leakage around the cork and the cork
plopped down into the btl when I attempted to extract it, sometimes. The wine was still drinkable, if a bit tired.
But not (overly) oxidized and certainly not turned to vinegar. Was it as good as an uncompromised btl??
Never had the opportunity to make that comparison.
But my feeling is if the btl is ullaged down to the bottom of the neck, or onto the shoulder...meh.
Tom
TomHill
Here From the Very Start
 
Posts: 3197
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:01 pm


Return to The Wine Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hoke and 7 guests