Peter Ruhrberg wrote:David,
I don't mean to be critical of 2005 here in any way.
David M. Bueker wrote:I do. Early returns are nowhere near the 2001 level for me.
Rahsaan wrote:David M. Bueker wrote:I do. Early returns are nowhere near the 2001 level for me.
In what way?
The shorthand I'm hearing for 05 is '03 with acid' - which sounds something like 01, although perhaps more sugar?
David M. Bueker wrote:So far the 2005s I have had do not have the depth of flavor of the 2001s. Of course all I have had are QbA-Spatlese, but that's the stuff I like best anyway, so if 2005 is a vintage for auslese+ then I m not all that interested anyway.
Rahsaan wrote:Ok, I can see that, and makes sense from the weather patterns.. AM still excited/curious to taste, but perhaps with more Guarded Enthousiasm
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Jim Cassidy and 8 guests