Page 1 of 1

WTN /WineAdvisor: Back in the U.S.A. (KitFox 2003 "Foxy" California Red)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:48 pm
by Robin Garr
Back in the U.S.A.

Back home from Italy and full of happy memories of Tuscan food and wine, I was tempted to whip up something inspired by my restaurant experiences in Siena for dinner last night.

But reality spoke with a louder voice, and in the woozy aftermath of a 22-hour travel day, combined with a supply of okra in the fridge that had been fresh when I left last week, a simple, American-style meal seemed like a more practical idea.

The dinner part was easy: A simple sausage gumbo with rice required little mental or physical effort; and the slumgullion-style mélange neatly obscured any browned and wizened bits on the okra. For extra credit, the dinner provided a fine opportunity to carry on my never-ending quest to pair dry table wines with fiery dishes.

This time - in contrast with my recent pairing of a slightly sweet, gently fizzy [url=http://www.wineloverspage.com/wineadvisor1/tswa061013.phtml">artisanal Lambrusco[/url] with another Cajun dish, red beans and rice - I tried a smooth, fruity, low-tannin but properly acidic California red, <b>KitFox 2003 "Foxy"</b> red table wine that had been a recent California Wine Club selection. It worked out well: The flavors were surprisingly complementary, and the wine's literally mouth-watering acidity seemed to create a palate environment that helped quench the spicy heat of the Cajun fare.

<table border="0" align="right" width="100"><tr><td><img src="http://www.wineloverspage.com/graphics1/foxy1024.jpg" border="1" align="right"></td></tr></table>KitFox 2003 "Foxy" California Red Table Wine ($14.99)

Dark blackish-purple color, ruby glints against the light. Appealing fruit aromas, blackberries and blueberries and plums, are echoed in fresh-fruit flavors so juicy that they almost seem sweet, but snappy acidity provides balance and food-friendliness, with alcohol at a hearty but rational 13.5%. A blend of 75% Cabernet Sauvignon and 25% Syrah, it's a very user-friendly red, but there's plenty here to satisfy more serious "wine geeks." (Oct. 24, 2006)

<B>FOOD MATCH:</b> The wine's forward fruit, mouth-watering acidity and relatively modest tannins worked very well as a flavor match and reasonably well as a quencher with a spicy Cajun-style okra gumbo.

<B>VALUE:</B> Well-matched against the competition in the mid-teens, but note that you may be able to find it well below this winery retail price.

<B>WHEN TO DRINK:</B> It's holding up well, although its synthetic cork argues against holding it much longer. I'd drink this vintage over the next year.

<B>WEB LINK:</B>
The winery Website includes background about the KitFox winery, its vineyards and the wines. There's a list of state distributors in the U.S., and a fax order form for online buying.

<B>FIND THIS WINE ONLINE:</B>
Compare prices and find vendors for KitFox "Foxy" on Wine-Searcher.com.
This, with the Foxy White, was a recent monthly selection from California Wine Club. The popularity of this pair made it a quick sellout, but it couldn't hurt to call the club at 1-800-777-4443 to see if they've got any left.

Re: WTN /WineAdvisor: Back in the U.S.A. (KitFox 2003 "Foxy" California Red)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:23 pm
by Paul B.
Well that must be the first time I've seen "foxy" and "Californian red" in the same sentence ... :lol:

Re: WTN /WineAdvisor: Back in the U.S.A. (KitFox 2003 "Foxy" California Red)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:47 pm
by Robin Garr
Paul B. wrote:Well that must be the first time I've seen "foxy" and "Californian red" in the same sentence ... :lol:


Stop and think about it, Paul: "Foxy" and similar labrusca-related terminology is so far off the radar in California that a winery called KitFox has no second thoughts about using the term "Foxy" on the label, and need harbor no fear that anyone will mistake it for Cream White Concord.

Re: WTN /WineAdvisor: Back in the U.S.A. (KitFox 2003 "Foxy" California Red)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:23 pm
by Paul B.
I guess so. But then again the realities of California are pretty far removed from a way out here too ... 8)