by Tim York » Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:56 am
Good article. I am already broadly following that policy. I slowed down on Bordeaux from the turn of the millenium and the last GC I bought was Pontet-Canet 04. My last decent Burg purchase was of 2002 and of Barolo 1999.
I fully agree with Southern Rhône and Chianti (indeed all Tuscan Sangiovese except Brunello) as choices for ongoing purchases of reds for a short/medium term horizon and would add Languedoc/Roussilon, the Loire valley, Beaujolais, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo and some Rioja. Most whites, even those which keep well and improve with time after a closed period, are usually delicious in the first year after bottling and I now look on new purchases in that perspective.
I'm not so sure about Burgundy. In my experience of GC and 1er C and even villages, some of the "lesser" years like 2000 provide delicious drinking young but others like 93, 95, 96 and 99 need time. I look to the Côte Chalonnaise where the wines develop more rapidly.
I am hoping that stocks built up of the 90s vintages and earlier will see me through my needs for Bordeaux, Burgundy, N. Rhône, CndP, Barolo/Barbaresco, traditional Rioja, mature Mosel, etc.
Tim York