Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34387
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
42664
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Redwinger
Wine guru
4038
Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:36 pm
Way Down South In Indiana, USA
Hoke
Achieving Wine Immortality
11420
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am
Portland, OR
Redwinger wrote:David-
How many points do you give the book? If not too much work, it might be useful for you to assign points to each region and/or critic.
TPFIC,
Wm.(Who is cranky from doing 4 hours of inventory in the pit and made very little progress).
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34387
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Hoke wrote:Redwinger wrote:David-
How many points do you give the book? If not too much work, it might be useful for you to assign points to each region and/or critic.
TPFIC,
Wm.(Who is cranky from doing 4 hours of inventory in the pit and made very little progress).
I think that's a great idea, Bill.
Then instead of having to read through all that stuff, we could just see the score for each region. That could probably get it down to one page.
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34387
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34387
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34387
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker wrote:...... That said, wines change over time, and since the book provides retrospective data (some scores go back into the 90s) the original notes would be somewhat meaningless as wines change over time. Of course the same can be said of the scores, but there is the idea that numerical ratings are assigned based on a wine's current status and it's potential. I would not buy the book if I were looking to find out what a given wine tastes like - the information just isn't there.
....Whatever one thinks about Parker's palate preferences......
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34387
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
42664
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Salil Benegal wrote:Shame to hear about Dr. Miller's review on Australia. Would be really nice if we could get someone to review the region for the US who didn't apply a standard that Aussie wines have to be inky black and crammed with fruit, and would slaughter wines that didn't measure up to that yardstick for being 'tart, lean and European-styled'.
TomHill wrote:However, as we've been told, RP's scores apply to the wine when it's at it's peak. So the scores do not change w/ time. On the rare occasions that RP will change a score for a famous/great wine, it seems to cause a lot of buzz ... implies that RP made a mistake ... a concept that some people cannot accept.
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34387
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, Google [Bot] and 3 guests