Last week I had a little wine adventure with old Yarden wines. Our distributor came across some long lost Yarden gift sets in the warehouse. These particular sets are so old that the included red and white are Yarden Cabernet Sauvignon 1998 and Yarden Chardonnay 2000.
I was excited to try these out so we popped one of each open immediately. When I pulled the cork on the 1998 Cabernet I was pleased to find the cork in perfect condition, and was impressed with how deeply stained purple it was. A wine professional at a tasting once claimed that the cork stain is irrelevant, but my experience has taught me to begin salivating whenever I see this. Here’s my tasting note:
Yarden Cabernet Sauvignon 1998
A dark and muddy color, with slight browning.
Lively tannins and acidity. Pleasant charred oak flavors mingled with dark, sweet, and pleasantly jammy fruit flavors of mostly blackberry, with black cherry, mulberry, and cola notes.
In my enthusiasm I concluded with, “Mature, but still big and delicious”. (and it’s still showing some of this fruit today, 4 days later)
So once again Yarden shows it’s mettle for aging. But here’s the shocker, the Yarden Chardonnay 2000, which we opened after the Cab mostly as a curiosity (“oh, let’s see how far gone this is”), managed to maybe even TOP the performance of the Cabernet Sauvignon.
We opened the Chardonnay, and we got the reassuring pop. The cork had that soaked appearance almost to the top. We each poured a taste, took a sip, then silence. The rep broke the silence when he summed up succinctly (and rather impiously) what we were both thinking: “It’s f------ great.”
My tasting note:
Yarden Chardonnay 2000
Clear deep golden color.
Beautiful, ethereal oak and vanilla, biscuity. Like a vanilla cookie.
Has this amazing lightness, delicacy, and elegance.
Great aftertaste, hazelnut.
It reminds you why people ever bothered putting chardonnay in oak.
Basically, I was shocked by how good the Chardonnay tasted. As I noted it had this incredible lightness to it, and really did not come across as mature on the palate, except maybe in the lack of fruitiness. It seemed to be mostly the oak you noticed, but it was so pleasant and delicate. It wasn’t like the 2003 Yarden Chardonnay, which I had within the last year and felt was heavier and not aging as gracefully. I noticed Rogov did not include this in the 2009 edition of the Israeli Guide, but in the 2008 it got an 89. Personally I thought this bottle was in the 90 point range and might be worth revisiting.
